Tom Snyder explores a judge's ruling that Google unlawfully cemented its search dominance through exclusionary deals.

No Chrome divestiture, no choice screen, but big changes for search defaults, index access, and AI competition are coming.

After Mehta’s initial ruling, the Department of Justice (DoJ) demanded that Google divest itself of the Chrome web browser ...

A couple of days ago, the NotebookLM team announced via a X (formerly Twitter) post that it's rolling out new Audio Overview formats. The team followed up with another post that the new formats have ...

Google won't have to sell off Chrome or Android, and it will be mostly business as usual for billions of consumers.

Big-money traders leave clues, and the Whisper Index deciphers them to uncover stocks ready to run. Our system flagged Uber, ...

"These are very dynamic, rapidly changing markets and judges would basically be out of their element if they tried to ...

A federal court’s remedies ruling allows Google to retain its Chrome browser and continue paying Apple billions for Safari search placement while recognizing the growing influence of generative AI on ...

Google retains Chrome and Android. It'll also have to share data with AI rivals, which could accelerate web traffic declines.

Earlier this year, the AI community was abuzz over DeepSeek R1, a new open-source reasoning model. The model was developed by ...

A U.S. judge ruled Google can keep its $20B Safari search deal with Apple and other partnerships but must share some search data with competitors.

Here's how the judge's remedies in the Department of Justice's Google antitrust case could affect Apple, OpenAI, and ...