资讯
Even so, Alphabet didn't escape unscathed. While the penalties pose no immediate threat, over the long run, the possibility ...
4 天Opinion
Dealbreaker on MSNGoogle Antitrust Remedies: Threading The Needle Between Overkill And Underkill
L ast summer, when Judge Amit Mehta ruled that Google had violated antitrust laws through its search distribution agreements, ...
After Mehta’s initial ruling, the Department of Justice (DoJ) demanded that Google divest itself of the Chrome web browser ...
7 天
Android Central on MSNWhat does Google's big court 'win' mean for us?
Google won't have to sell off Chrome or Android, and it will be mostly business as usual for billions of consumers.
The total value of these trillion-dollar companies now stands at $21 trillion, with Google at the center of the momentum.
Judge Amit P. Mehta's opinion emphasizes how the rise of AI search has opened new competitive possibilities and saved Google ...
The nuclear option for addressing the tech giant’s search dominance — a break-up — is off the table. That’s lifting Big Tech ...
Just earlier this year, the US DOJ came in hot arguing "Google must divest the Chrome browser", and accusing it of dominance ...
The search giant is not being broken up -so how much will it be affected by the remedies a judge has instead ordered?
“Google will not be required to divest Chrome; nor will the court include a contingent divestiture of the Android operating ...
Judge Amit P. Mehta rejected the Justice Department’s call to break up Google, listing remedies for his finding last year ...
一些您可能无法访问的结果已被隐去。
显示无法访问的结果